•  
  • GB3
  • Bill Murray on Ghostbusters 3,”I’ll believe it when I see it.”

Bill Murray on Ghostbusters 3,”I’ll believe it when I see it.”

Categories: GB3
Comments: 78 Comments
Published on: October 14, 2009

At the premiere of Fantastic Mr Fox, in which he voices a badger, Bill Murray “exclusively spills the beans on Ghostbusters 3″ – yeah, you and everyone else has the exclusive scoop. And how unsurprising that they all conflict.

Basically, Bill confirms he hasn’t seen a script, he is not committed to doing it until he’s seen a script and is confident that it’s really good. He goes on to say that there is no script, just “a wish-list for someone”, but this just seems to be Bill not being in the know, as Reitman, Aykroyd, and Ramis have all confirmed a script. Alternately, Murray may just be speaking in terms of a green-lit script. Meaning, “there’s no script” equals “a script hasn’t been approved.”

It’s a bit of a step back from all the “Everyone is on-board” talk recently, and it confirms that Bill remains the hardest sell for a third movie.

Thanks, Matthew!

Share this
78 Comments
  1. Dan Evans says:

    Haha that’s kind of a slap in the face but maybe Bill was just trying to do damage control. It is true that everyone’s kind of experiencing GB3 hysteria and maybe he’s just trying to reign everyone in a bit. Can’t blame him for not wanting to make a shitty movie.

  2. Pete VenkmanPHD says:

    Honestly, this reassures me that if a third move is done, and Bill Murray is involved, it WILL be up to par. I would hate to see a movie filmed just for the sake of filming it. It should have a certian depth to it.

  3. dan says:

    I don’t care what his answer was, he was hilarious in that interview.

  4. Dan says:

    Bill is in the same league as Ernie. They’re actors in the movie, not the creative minds behind the production of the film. So its not surprising, Bill nor Ernie have seen the script yet. Dan, Harold, and Ivan are the people that we need to hear from at this early state.

    But Bill still seems optimistic about the 3rd film, he’s just hesitant about the quality of the film. he was just stating he hasnt seen the script yet.

  5. DocLathropBrown says:

    Yeah, if this happens, it will be because it’s GOOD. Since that’s the only way to get Bill on board. Especially after the bait-and-switch they pulled on him for GB2 (eliminating from the shooting script everything that sold him on the idea), we’ll be extra weary.

    But if Bill wants a really good script, he should step in and offer up the kind of things he wants. That way, he’s satisfied.

    Yeah, Bill is being realisitc about it, but not against it, which is a very good sign. He wants quality. If the quality is there, he’ll definitely do it.

  6. Dr. Venkman says:

    I honestly have no problem with this interview.

    He basically just says he will do it if its good. If not, he doesn’t need, or want, to do it.

    That’s perfectly fine by me.

  7. Martha says:

    Aww, it’s good to see him. He looks great there. Hope he will get the GB3 script soon, so they can start shooting it.

  8. JFHideout says:

    I agree with Dr. V… I’m actually a bit relieved to hear him confidently say he won’t do it unless the script is good. Of course Bill did 2 mediocre Garfield movies (this coming from a Garfield strip fan and a Bill fan), but we all know he doesn’t NEED to do a GB3 just for the heck of it, so I’m happy to hear he seems cautious about it (unless he’s just saying that, but still… sounds better than him saying “No matter what the script, I’m in!” … we don’t need an “Evolution 2″)

  9. AJ Quick says:

    I think that is a fair analysis. What comes first? The green light or the script?

  10. Chad Paulson says:

    The script has already been given a thumbs up. Once it is 100% embraced by the studio, Ghostbusters 3 will have a production number and we can all do the dance of joy.

  11. Patrick says:

    Chad your 100% correct!!! This video was taking thisSummer when the office writers were still writing the GB3 script!! Everybody likes the GB3 script including Bill Murray and Dan,Harold and Ivan said that everyone is in GB3! Sony WILL like the GB3 script to No Doubt! Yeah the GB3 script has given a Thumbs Up! The GB3 script is finished and everyone has a copy of it! Why do you think my #1 Favorite actress Sigourney is back on board because the script is Awesome and after she read it she said ok put me back in! I had a dream about that I met my #1 Favorite actress Sigourney and we talked about GB3 so she read the script liked it a lot then she talked to Harold and Dan and Ivan so my dream came true. When I first heard this I said Thank You Lord and Thank You Sigourney! 2012 GB3 will be here so ther’s no wories Sony will make GB3 for a 2012 release because Sony WILL like the script as well as the Original GB’s and Sigourney and Ivan did!!! Belive me I willdo the dance of Joy by watching Ghostbusters 2 like I did this Sunday!!!

  12. Dan Evans says:

    To answer AJ, the script has to come before green lit. If the script’s to everyone’s liking, I imagine that studio will give the production the green light.

  13. Logo Lou says:

    Actually, I think in hollywood a project can get a greenlight before the script, but not usually. Particularly in sequels (not this case) they greenlight it AND announce a release date before word one has been written! Not a good thing, but I think it does happen. Of course, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was supposedly the “great” script that got everyone back after years of saying they wouldn’t do it otherwise.

  14. vandriven says:

    I love you Bill, grew up in the 80s. But stop being a bitch, ghostbusters 1 & 2 were awesome. Everybody knows that. Just stop playing hard to get.

  15. vandriven says:

    Btw, crystal skull was a great movie. Wish people would stop “insulting ” it.

  16. castewar says:

    Patrick, no, see, this is the problem…

    This video was taken less than TWELVE HOURS AGO!

    The movie premiere he is at happened this evening in London – he was talking to them while North America was just getting up.

    http://www.cbc.ca/arts/film/story/2009/10/14/london-film-fest.html

    He did NOT say this in the Summer.

    You CANNOT just invent facts to support your wishes.

    You’ve been doing stuff like this for years now – and it’s this that drives us nuts, not that you think Ghostbusters 3 to happen. We want it, most of us, to happen too. But we’re not prepared to live in a perpetual state of “it’s happening now… no… now! Wait… NOW!… hang on…”

  17. Raystantz Italy says:

    and what about Ivan Reitman’s words? You know, the script approved, everybody onboard…

  18. Jacob Bartlett says:

    Bill Murray’s stance on of “I’ll believe it when I see it” on Ghostbusters 3 is pretty much what everyone thinks. Or should think, ya know?

  19. Hod says:

    Thank god… Honestly thank god. Aykroyd is desperate, Ramis is a puppet, and Murray is rich enough to do whatever he wants. And he does not want to make a crappy passing the torch flick. He is looking for a good script, and I will trust Murray’s judgement. It’s exciting to hear news that it won’t happen. As long as Murray wants a real reason to get out of the house there is a chance for GB3.

    I’ve always used the metaphor that Ghostbusters 3 is like hearing there is a hot chick waiting for you in the back bedroom of a party. You get the news and move towards the back bedroom but as you walk everyone says “Well I think there’s a tranny in that bedroom” It slowly starts to spread that the chick is in fact a dude in that bedroom. You get more and more nervous but are forced to walk to the bedroom. And right when you are turning the knob Bill Murray jumps out and yells “It’s Tranny Run For It!”. Then you escape without opening the door.

  20. Antonio says:

    “Yeah, if this happens, it will be because it’s GOOD. Since that’s the only way to get Bill on board. Especially after the bait-and-switch they pulled on him for GB2 (eliminating from the shooting script everything that sold him on the idea), we’ll be extra weary.”

    If you don’t mind my asking, what was taken from the GB2 script that Bill liked?

    “Btw, crystal skull was a great movie. Wish people would stop “insulting ” it.”

    I wouldn’t call it great, but Crystal Skull was entertaining for me. Probably my favorite Indy film, but I’ve never been a big fan of the series.

  21. EctoGlow says:

    I think Bill is playing dumb in a sense i dont mean that he is dumb thats not what im saying but its like when you sneak a look at your xmas presents and your parents find out and your all like what? what xbox i dont know what your talking about. Hollywood types do that.

  22. Chad Paulson says:

    I agree with EctoGlow. He’s playing it down and it seems like he is at odds with someone about the treatment. I still have a good vibe, but what do I know?

  23. Austin says:

    Ghostbusters III in CGI coming in 2009. Real, not a lie! They were supposed to show the trailer at ComicCon last year but the projector broke.

  24. Anthony says:

    Yeah he is the hard sell and yeah Bill Murray is erratic, ask anyone whose worked with him. This interview could be interpreted a million different ways. I say, stay calm, be patient, and see what unfolds.

  25. Fryman86 says:

    Ghostbusters III already came out two years ago but all the tv commercial prints got burned in a fire, so they couldn’t advertise it, so only a few theatres picked it up, and only a handful of people saw it. The DVD is comming out on December 32nd!

  26. Brian says:

    It seems to me to be not so much a slap-in-the-face as a reality check. Murray doesn’t want to do it unless the script is good. This is a lot better than a few years ago when he was so dead set against it that he got into an argument with Harold Ramis about it on the set of Groundhog Day.

  27. Chad Paulson says:

    Brian is dead on. Murray is simply making sure things go the right way. It may not happen, but we are still damn close.

  28. whoiseyevan says:

    Someone, mentioned this earlier, and I concur… Bill does look really great here. And it was awfully nice of him to be so candid.

  29. Extreme_gb4evr says:

    i told you so…

  30. EctoGlow says:

    If you really listen to what bill says in the interview its absolutly nothing diffrent than what he has been saying since his intrest in gb came back when he worked on the game. He may or may not have seen the script he didnt specify he said he isnt going to believe that it until he see’s the script. Now i take it that he is meaning see the script approved which it hasnt been yet and later he says there is no script which we know isnt the case which leads me to believe that he talking about an approved script. But him being a person who owns s tad bit of the rights, with the game being out and an obviously new found intrest with the public where ghostbusters concerned, its obviouse that he knows more than he is saying he does. Actors dont kiss and tell so to speak.

  31. Gordon says:

    I would hate to see it happen, but if he is so against it and the others are so for it, they could just write him out of the script, people die every day you know. Some freak accident, Venkman got careless with a trap or something.

  32. Dennis says:

    Patrick, NOBODY cares about your [wet] dreams of Segourney Weaver!

    There’s a little thing called REALITY! You can either embrace it and live in the NOW (not 2012), or you can continue to act like some sort of GB 3 psychic, and be constantly proven WRONG time and time again!

    The fact of the matter is, the MAJORITY of the GB public (which is us btw) knows who/what you are, so there is NO point whatsoever in arguing with any of us, because for everything you think you know, we know A LOT more! And, YES we’ve seen/read ALL (if not more) of the “info” that you have constantly berated us with (along with all the profanity), but we are mature/smart enough to take it for what it is, SPECULATION! Which means SQUAT until the movie is near completion!

    And, BTW? You SERIOUSLY, SERIOUSLY need to learn how to spell…and use proper grammer, because you sound (from the looks of your posts) like a complete moron!

    Sorry guys, I just had to get that out of my system.

    OK, back on topic.

  33. fifth_beatle says:

    He’s the male version of Debbie Downer. He’s probably sick of people asking him about it, day in and day out. If you catch him on a good day, he’ll say he’s excited about it. Other days, he’ll say to get the mike out of his face. Typical Hollywood stance. He’s a bit of an egotist, don’t you think? Or, that’s what I got from this interview. “Oh, I’ll just stay home and play Snooker.”

  34. Brandon says:

    It’s NOT because Bill is “out of the loop,” like a few of you have said. He’s one of the Rights-holders in the film. When was this interview done, by the way? This movie is on a fast-track, and that’s just reading and documenting the dates these stories were in print. Aykroyd received the script. Sept 19th, Reitman had a copy of the script in hand. Sept 23rd, Ramis was in L.A. Oct, Aykroyd says they have a script, but nothing is official. Oct 10th, Reitman says all of the Rightsholders have the script and have approved it and hopefully, Sony will too. And that’s according to Retiman. So this thing, by multiple reports is flying forward at some rate, I think Murray just wants to keep a leash on it. God bless you, Bill. If it’s shit, don’t sign it over. Tell ‘em to F%*! off.

  35. Prologic9 says:

    More than likely they’ll continue to work on the script before showing it to Murray. From the sound of it they’ll likely only get one shot with him.

    Even if the script is good and Murray goes for it, they still have to work the numbers with the studio. Figuring out the paychecks for this particular project will be a bitch, and could very well stop the project in its tracks as easily as Murray could.

  36. CNCGB, Boyer says:

    I agree with Prologic9. I don’t think Murray will get a copy of the script until it’s the best darn script ever known to man – or Sumerian god. Everything rides on Murray and they’re not going to screw this up. But on the other hand Bill doing damage control sounds reasonable too. I choose both. Bill means there’s no green lit script in my opinion. Of course there’s tons of GB3 scripts like the old Hellbent script by Dan, but none have been picked up by the studio 100% yet. I think this is what Bill means. There is no official green lit script yet.

  37. That had better be a damn-fine script for Murray! We don’t want to tarnish his long history of Oscar worthy performances in such films as Space Jam, Larger then Life, Garfield, and Zombieland. *Rolls eyes*

    Where the HELL did the excitment he had about another GB go, that he had in past interviews?

    Honestly, Murray is walking a trecherous, fine line here/now.

    He needs to realize that I’m sure all involved will make/have made the script as best as they possibly can. If not, then yes, why do it? I agree with Murray there. But there are certain realistic limits. Let’s be honest…they’re going to write their best. But their never going to get close to any cinematic “second coming”. And if Murray will not join for nothing less, then he’s: just not doing it for “the sake of not doing it”, and believing in his own, hyped ego.

    We’re dealing with GB…NOT Gone With the Wind, here.

    I just don’t understand why Dan Aykroyd has made so many concessions to his original scripts and vision(s)-(making Murray not just a star, but a SUPER-star in the process)-, why Murray can’t also be a team player, and recognize the quality points of what has been written? To not overlook them, and focus on every possible negative thing, as reason to not do another film. When the less favorable areas of a/the script can be tweaked or changed, if he just colaborated. Instead of taking just a “wait and see, I’ll only do it if it’s REAL good” approach?

    With him being such a big “rights holder”, stop being a pre-madonna. Get involved, and make this happen, Mr.Murray! Isn’t that the point?

    Cause I’ll tell ya…if it all crumbles this time. We may never see this level of interest or persistence for another GB film, ever again!

  38. Raystantz Italy says:

    your last quote…………..gave me shivers!

  39. I doubt Bill will get involved… unless he dies in the first 5 mins from too much slime.

  40. Jimbo says:

    I think Bill’s just trying to keep everyone from getting all hyped up just to let there be a huge letdown.I think he holds Ghostbusters up there somewhere we all do…with a lot of respect and doesnt want to taint something that we all love so much. As he says,if its a good script he’d do it but he just doesnt wanna make another one to make another one. I say he gets a hold of Dan Harold and Ivan and throws in some creative ideas of his own to help get things rolling in the proper direction.

  41. not exactly the kind of news I wanted to hear from him, but at least he didnt say “no way, I dont care how good the script is, Im not doing another Ghostbuusters movie” and Im surprised there wasnt any mention of Zombieland or the infamous scene w/ Woody

  42. Webbsta says:

    You guys ever seen the Steve Martin / Eddie Murphy film “Bowfinger?”

    ‘Cause Aykroyd, Ramis, Hudson and Reitman could easily get Bill involved without his knowledge, if they wanted ;)

  43. Gareee says:

    That premier interview date was Oct. 14th. yesterday.. so his beliefs and comments are very current. ;)

  44. fryguy81 says:

    What bait and switch did they use on Bill in the second Ghostbusters movie. This is the first I’ve heard of something like this.

  45. Bannen says:

    Finally, some cold water poured on the raging Ghostbusters 3 wildfires. Don’t take that as me not wanting to see a GB3 become a reality, but I think we’ve all allowed the overflow of Ghostbusters love this year (with the 25th anniversary, the video game, etc) cloud our minds to varying degrees. Leave it to Bill Murray to be the one who has to point out that aside from a script being worked on, nothing’s even close to being set in stone yet. And if he hasn’t agreed to anything, then the project is just as much wishful thinking as it was a few years ago.

    Of course, some people see stuff like this clip and assume it cannot possibly be correct, because it runs directly opposite to the imaginary sources they’ve been recycling for years, so they invent fantastic new lies to add to the mountain of false information and rumor they’ve been shouting from the top of for so long. All it took was two seconds on google to know that video is less than a day old – but in comes those who want to be believed, to be the one in the know, the one on the inside, and the one who usually has a VERY poor grasp on grammar. Why these kinds of folks (well, we all know it’s just one person) are allowed to continue to run roughshod over this site, I do not know.

  46. Raystantz Italy says:

    but…maybe Bill wasn’t aware of Reitman’s outing few days ago? Ivan’s words were clear: “THe script IS approved”

  47. Hod says:

    Well Reitman simply said the plot was approved by all parties. People are making up pretty ridiculous conspiracy theories as to why Murray said there is no script. He didn’t say it in context of “there is no approved script” He said there was no script at all.

    It makes sense that he has not seen the script. Ramis said in an interview several months ago, that he hadn’t spoke with Murray and would wait until they had a finished script to show him. If Bill does not like the script then it is over. So I’m sure they are getting everything finalized, approved by sony, and all the drafts done before they send it to Murray. The bad news here is this. Everyone is asking Murray about Ghostbusters instead of the projects he’s out promoting and the longer they take with this script shenanigans “Been close to a year and a half in the writing” the more agitated I’m sure Murray will get.

    What also worries me is the bad drama the office writers write. Well bad comedy as well. But there will probably be some stupid @ss drama in it. If you remember the first film it really had almost none of that. It wasn’t too serious, it was just joke after joke without dwelling on relationship drama.

  48. Ghoulishfright says:

    Yep, this is pretty much good news I think. Bill’s attitude means that if GB3 is gonna be made, its gonna be made RIGHT. It’s either gonna be insanely, unspeakably MIND-BLOWING or it’s gonna be nothing at all. Bill is simply reassuring us that GB3, if it is made, will be made for only the right reasons and will be of the highest quality. So any fears you have about silly Judd Apatow-type actors like Steve Carrell, or even Ben Stiller and Jack Black types, screwing up Ghostbusters 3…. well, you can lay those fears to rest. Bill Murray isn’t gonna let that happen; GB is his baby too, not just Dan or Harold or Ivan’s.

    The only bad thing about this all is that, the right script needs to be produced sooner rather than later. I don’t think they have the right script yet, and this reawakened love for Ghostbusters, in light of the 25th anniversary, etc., is not going to last forever, and neither will the guys be fit for the job forever. I think the next 2-3 years is when things have REALLY got to come together. NOW is the time, NOW is our chance to get this thing going. The stars are aligned, but only for a short while. So hopefully this dream script gets produced asap.

    ….and on the issue of the script, I’m wondering if they’ve even consulted Bill at all, like on the idea and everything. If Bill is so nitpicky (in the good way of course), I think they ought to get a basic story idea approved by him first if they haven’t; maybe even involve him in the creative process if he’s game. Otherwise, if they’re just pumping out script after script, and only getting Bill’s word on the FINAL product – well then, this approval process could take years. It TAKES the better part of a year to write these things generally. And if the writers are drafting out story ideas which are destined for Bill’s disapproval simply by their inherent, crappy nature, well then, this approach needs to be changed. …So hopefully the powers that be start to involve Bill in the creative process more, and earlier on, for each proposed script. Let’s get a story idea approved first, then these script drafts won’t be such a waste of time.

  49. Patrick says:

    Bill Murray has already agreed to a Ghostbusters 3 that’s what Harold said on Sept.30th. The script is done everyone has a copy of the script and Sony will like the script and they will make it because the Original GB’s likes the GB3 script as well. Sigourney is back which I’m pleased about and she liked the script to and that’s why she’s back on board! It’s Gona Happen in 2012 and I can’t wait!!

  50. Patrick says:

    It’s Gonna Happen in 2012 so why worry? You guys go way overboard!

  51. Aaron says:

    Great comments from the indisputable star of the Ghostbusters movies. If they write him out of GBIII I’ll skip it. Ramis and Aykroyd don’t have stellar track records lately (neither does Reitman) so Murray is right to tread carefully.

    Sure, Bill Murray has done his share of dreck, but maybe he holds more affection for the Venkman character than he does for Garfield, or for the guy he played in Space Jam.

    As for GB 2, I’ve heard him say for years that the script he read and approved wasn’t the same one that they filmed. He mentioned something about the “effects guys” getting ahold of it (though I don’t think the special effects are the problem with GB 2…). If the 3rd one doesn’t have a strong story, and if it lacks the character interplay that made the first one so great, I’d rather they skip it altogether.

    And “Crystal Skull” was terrible.

  52. Max says:

    Hod,

    I just couldn’t stop laughing at the mental image of Bill jumping out from a room screaming “It’s a Tranny! Run for it!”

    Me too, I’m afraid GB3 will end up being a tranny.

  53. Ecto Freak says:

    We finish on the future and Ghostbusters III. The news that there is third movie on the way has been chewing up the internet for months. Typically, Murray, who is next up in Jim Jarmusch’s fantastically droll assassin’s tale The Limits of Control, is not entirely enthusiastic about the idea. “What they really want from us is just to open the movie and then get lost after introducing a new generation of ghostbusters, who can start the franchise all over again,” he says with a shrug. “I’ve heard the script idea, and part of it is good but, ye know, it’s going to be tough to start again.”

    http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6876687.ece

  54. Dennis says:

    “Patrick
    Posted October 15, 2009 at 12:52 PM
    It’s Gonna Happen in 2012 so why worry? You guys go way overboard!”

    Wait a minute! Who goes WAY overboard?!

    It’s sure as hell not us! Have you EVER read your own posts? Probably not.

    I’m sure that Bill (as an actor/artist) will NEVER truly get over the emotional discontent that he received from GB 2, so I can understand him being a little weary of doing a third GB film. And I wholeheartedly agree with him not likeing the idea of basically re-hashing the GB 2 plot (reopening the business), but with a younger generation? But I will say this, if they do make GB 3, hopefully it will be THE last GB movie, because it just won’t be the same without them (Bill, Dan, Harold, Ernie, etc).

  55. Sam says:

    AARON:

    Sure, Bill Murray has done his share of dreck, but maybe he holds more affection for the Venkman character than he does for Garfield, or for the guy he played in Space Jam.

    Umm… just so you know, Bill Murray played HIMSELF in Space Jam. He may like Venkman alot, but I think he has more “affection” for himself!

    LOL

  56. Gazareth says:

    Hmm, it intrigues me how Bill will sign up to be a badger in what looks to me like a crappy Hollywood take on a Roald Dahl classic (almost certain to flop on both sides of the Atlantic) and a Garfield sequel, and YET he still uses the “sequels are bad” line.

  57. EctoGlow says:

    Give him time it will all work its self out in the wash

  58. Raystantz Italy says:

    Reitman’s word’s:

    1- “For the first time possibilities are more positive than negative. Before we needed some twist to be able to make it, now if there isn’t any other major change we will do it”

    This is not “The project is grenlighted” he talks of possibilities!

    2- “It took so long to come to a decision about the new Ghostbusters because all the rights holders were able to say their word on the plot, and they’re a lot! It’s never easy to bring all these people to an agreement on something but now there’s a script, a definitive one, complete and approved”

    mmmh….this is a little bit more definitive. What about Bill saying “There is no script”? I read the link posted few minutes ago….where Bill say that “part of the plot is good”….. the question is: Ivan say “there is a SCRIPT (not a draft or a plot idea…i guess Reitman know the difference between them all)a script COMPLETED AND APPROVED……and Bill say “It’s a bunch of talk, there is no script”. Who is saying the truth?

    3- “The project needs the presence of everyone” again, this is no “Everybody signed for it”

    4- “The videogame’s big success convinced many of the people involved in the production that there’s still engagement with ghosts busting”. MANY OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED…this don’t means ALL the people

    5- The second movie was some kind of exploitation of the first but was too heavily based on special effects, in that way losing grip on what were the driving forces of the first: characters and jokes. This is something I still regret and now I’d like to pay tribute to those wonderful characters with this new one”.don’t means ALL the people involved…

    here we go: don’t worry Bill…..they know how to write a good story, they know how to not repeat the same errors!

    5-

  59. Superstarseven says:

    Aaron, no one gives a damn about what you think of Crystal Skull.
    And as confident as you seem saying it’s terrible then I’m just as sure saying that you’re wrong.

    How’s them apples?

  60. POSITRONCOLLIDER says:

    Best approximate 1 ½ hour durations of my life:
    GB1
    GB2
    Fornicating on my birthday
    * and GB3 will make that list NO MATTER what!

    Crystal Skulls’ purpose is to enrich an occasion and intoxicate those who possess a stomach and small/large intestines that can be plopped down in a theater seat to be present for 1 ½ hours of ghostbustin’ . I wouldn’t mind if they made shameless sponsor plug about it in GB3.

    Never operate a nuclear thrower under the influence.

  61. Matthew says:

    I have a feeling that instead of successfully rebooting ghostbusters the new movie will kill it.

    I’d prefer to see a new cartoon series with the likenesses of the actors and definately another game, but only if it’s better than Terminal Realitys effort.

  62. Maverick says:

    I’m thinking that we shouldn’t even mention Crystal Skull or any of the Star Wars Prequels when talking about Ghostbusters 3. No matter what you may have thought about the films, you have to remember that those movies were made by George Lucas… and George Lucas is NOT Ivan Reitman, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd or Harold Ramis.

    We honestly have no frame of reference on what to expect. All we have is faith.

  63. Maverick has a point right there ^

  64. Ecto Freak says:

    Dan talks about Gb3… again.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2le7_i4RPQ

  65. StormRyder says:

    Wait, are we talking about Indiana Jones Crystal Skull or the Crystal Skull Vodka? I got some of that Vodka and thought it was good, it’s meant for drinking not for “HOLY CRAP! Let’s so how F-ing Wasted i can get by chugging the whole bottle in 5 seconds!! AaaAhHHh…AaaghAGHaGhHgH!!” this is just wrong in every way, these people that think that they have to drink like this are either 16 or Completely REtarded, you have no place in society..cough..now Murray is just being cautious or from what he was saying, he is being lazy. that’s what i’m getting from his comments “It has to be good before leave my house”..he’s just not wanting to do it for some odd reason and it has nothing to do with GB2, i thought it was good, we’ll just have to wait and see

  66. StormRyder says:

    I’ve rewatched the video several times and i believe he is trying to do damage control, you see how he shrugs off some of the questions with casual answers and see it in his face. He knows about the script and he wants to hear from Reitman personally about it and i believe when it comes time and he sees the script he’ll tell them the changes that need to be made to make it a great movie, he’s probably been throwing some idea’s around himself….The Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull movie was okay, but was way out there..would have been better if they featured a story involving the real crystal skull and not aliens..come on, Indiana Jones and aliens?..FacePalm..2 completely different genres

  67. Brandon says:

    I’ve been thinking about running-time. Imagine all of the movies you’ve ever seen. Now imagine the stuff that has to happen with this new plot idea and the screen-time it would take to set up 4-6 new and unique characters (we have to see their lives as individuals), we have to be introduced to the idea of why the GHOSTBUSTERS decided to pass the torch, introduce the newbies into GHOSTBUSTNG, watch the jokes involved in shooting a proton-pack for the first time, the cameo screen-time for the original four, the screen-time dedicated and devoted to the gender-jokes we have to hear based on the new ‘formula-based’ redefining of the gender makeup of the team, AND screen-time for Sigourney, and this is all before the plot takes off. Is it possible to avoid a 2-hour running-time without a sub-compact trainwreck of a film like this?
    On a sidenote, this is possibly a good half-hour that I’d rather see without all of the predictable garbage they have planned.I’d like some surprise and excitement for my $12.50 ticket.

  68. Matthew says:

    Ghostbusters III needs to be original. It must avoid being too predictable. It needs to offer a brand new story and not feel repetitious or a like a repeat. It cannot make the mistake that Ghostbusters II did. It must offer something fresh and interesting but I don’t think that this should be done with the introduction of a new team.

    It also needs to be funny. It needs to be scary. It should concentrate on the characters and not the speacial effects. It must have all the feel of the original in visuals and sound but it must journey in a new direction in relation to story.

    I think this is what must be done in order to make a genuinly good and worthy sequel.

  69. Nev says:

    All the Crystal Skull and SW Prequel talk aside (which I think is definitely worth mentioning as an indicator of how NOT to do a sequel), I’m actually mostly concerned about how CGI will affect the feel of the ghostly encounters. I’d really like to see a mix of cg and prosthetics. I don’t care how good you think you are at 3D modeling/texturing/lighting, there is no way you could replicate the authentically scary transformation of the library ghost in 3D and have it look anywhere as convincing as it did in the first film.

  70. Matthew says:

    Well Ramis did an interview not so long ago in which he talks about the craft of animatronics and optical effects. He seems to prefer them as do I.

    I’d love the makers of Ghostbusters III to revert back to the old way of building puppets, models and doing matte paintings.

  71. Patrick says:

    Dan Aykroyd said that he has the GB3 script and it’s finished. Ivan Reitman said the samething that the script is finished and some of the GB’s already approved the script and it’s been accepted. Dan hasn’t had the Production number yet so when he does from Sony then he will let us know and Production will begin this Winter of 2009. When Harold went to L.A. for a GB3 meeting I guess the only people who showed up were Harold,Dan and Ivan. Bill hasn’t seen it yet but says great things about the Plot.Sigourney has already seen it and liked it a lot and that’s why she’s back which I’m glad about. Ernie hasn’t seen it either or Annie Potts because she’s back to. Belive me Ivan said that the script is Awesome along with Dan and Harold so after all GB’s reads the script then everyone will be in GB3. Bill,Ernie and Anie WILL like the GB3 script because Ivan was talking about that at a Spanish place. It’s still going to happen after Dan gets the Production number from Sony because Sony WILL like the GB3 script to. At the meeting Harold,Dan and Ivan liked the Plot and it’s been approved! On http://www.IFMagazine it says that Ivan will produce and direct GB3 and they said that the plot will be that the Original GB’s reopen up for business after all Hell Breaks Lose! When you click on that page click more news scroll down and you will see the Plot revealed. That was on this Monday on 10-12-09. See GB3 is already being approved by Sony already. Have a lot of Faith and we WILL get a Ghostbusters 3 in 2012!!!

  72. Patrick says:

    That’s http://www.IFMagazine.com sorry about that!!!

  73. Dan Evans says:

    I can’t believe everyone just ignored EctoFreak’s link to that article with a VERY TELLING quote from Murray.

    “What they really want from us is just to open the movie and then get lost after introducing a new generation of ghostbusters, who can start the franchise all over again,” he says with a shrug. “I’ve heard the script idea, and part of it is good but, ye know, it’s going to be tough to start again.”

    Here is the link EctoFreak posted.

  74. Raystantz Italy says:

    “What they really want from us…” yes, Sony hired the writers…but there are five party who can stop GB3 if the plot isn’t good…..and Bill then say “…part of it is good” (the script will need some adjustement).
    I don’t think that they success in reunite three loved actors from the 80′s to use them in just 30 minutes of movie. Maybe Bill was…sarcastic!

  75. Dan Evans says:

    Why wouldn’t you believe that? Seems pretty typical of Sony to me and we all know that’s what’s going to happen.

  76. Maverick says:

    Well, if Murray is right about what he said in this article, I personally don’t want a GB3.

  77. Raystantz Italy says:

    but if they don’t like being put apart after few minutes they can stop the project anytime!

  78. fryguy81 says:

    I don’t think the cgi will hurt the special effects. I mean the puppets and special effects that were done can still be done with cgi and you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference. REmember this isn’t some human they have to animate it’s a transparent ghost monster. I think the spud would look terrific in cgi.

    As for Crystal Skull. What is everpne’s problem with Crystal Skull. You had to know that Indy wouldn’t be the same. He’s about twenty years older. There’s no way he could pull the same young Indy. EVeryone brings up the fridge in the nuclear blast as being unrealistic.

    Surviving a nuclear blast in a lead line fridge is unrealistic, but a priest ripping the still beating heart from a kid who continues to live until he is engulfed in lava while his heart catche son fire, or a persons face melts from the vengeance of God. These thing happens everyday. I can’t turn the TV on without seeing a guy get his heart ripped out and still be alive as if nothing happened.

    Come on, if you didn’t like Crystal Skull because of script problems or direction or story I would understand but people can only bring up things in the movie that are simnilar to thing sdone in the previous movies that are hailed.

    Liek the prequesl I think that the expectation was just too much and Lucas nor Spielberg could never live up to them but God bless ‘em for trying.


Welcome , today is Saturday, February 4, 2012